Trust governance

Powers Protocol uses blockchain technology to add trust to governance.

Create rules that govern communities, organisations, movements — enforced by cryptography.

No tokens, no airdrops, no wallet needed. Just governance you can trust.

Without rules, human coordination becomes centralised, fragile, and unpredictable.

Governance is in crisis. Rules exist, but there is little trust they are actually followed — centralised power, no accountability, inaccessible processes, no historical record.

Powers makes rules transparent and enforceable: mandates (modular, role-restricted contracts) define who can take what action, and under which conditions. Deliberate in private, act in public.

Communities can design their own governance systems: assign roles to accounts, grant powers to roles, build in checks and balances, and govern their own reforms.

Read the documentation

Governance, solved.

Powers Protocol solves governance in a wide range of use cases.

Separation of Powers

As a governance architect, I need to assign proposal, deliberation, veto, and execution rights to distinct roles and mandates

so that no single actor can ever exceed their mandate.

Procedural overrides become structurally impossible unless every required party acts in concert. Powers enforces foundational governance principles by design, not by convention.

Multi-Party Coordination

As a consortium administrator, I need a coordination layer that works alongside our existing legal agreements

so that joint funds, shared oversight processes, and multi-party compliance no longer require expensive manual administration.

Every partner can verify in real time that the rules are being followed, without displacing the underlying agreements themselves.

Devolved Responsibilities

As a foundation director, I need to delegate authority to grants committees, working groups, and review boards within clearly enforceable boundaries

so that each body can act independently without risking overreach.

Delegation is structural, not procedural — every action is transparently recorded, and authority can be narrowed or revoked at any time.

Continuous Accountability

As an oversight stakeholder, I need a real-time transparency layer on top of our existing reporting structures

so that I no longer have to wait for the next periodic audit to know whether decisions followed the agreed rules.

Any party can verify compliance continuously, cutting the cost of oversight without replacing how we already report.

Beyond Institutional Reach

As a cross-border community organizer, I need enforceable governance rules that don't depend on a registered legal entity

so that contributors without formal legal status can still participate on equal footing.

Powers operates independently of (or alongside) whatever formal structure may follow later, letting early-stage communities adopt rigorous governance long before incorporation.

Pseudonymous Participation

As an activist or journalist, I need to prove my eligibility to participate without revealing my identity

so that I can engage safely in sensitive governance contexts like confidential research or whistleblowing.

Combined with ZKPassport and Account Abstraction, my participation rights are enforced directly on-chain, with no trusted intermediary able to expose who I am.

Beyond Token Voting

As a DAO founder, I need governance that doesn't rely on token-weighted voting

so that decisions aren't slow, gameable by whale wallets, or locked into a single voting mechanism forever.

Powers replaces single-token quorum votes with modular, role-based mandates — assign one-account-one-vote, multisig, or delegated roles, and swap the mechanism without redeploying the whole DAO.

1 / 7

Explore

Every organisation on Powers Protocol ships with a forum for proposals and voting, and an overview of all on-chain decisions — functional defaults, not locked-in products.

Governed 721

Governed 721 is an example of an organisation that governs specific functionality in a Protocol. In this case: setting payment split for royalties of NFT sales. It has a policy setting (the split) and enforcement (blacklisting of addresses). This type of organisation can be used to govern specific parameters or functionalities in a larger ecosystem, such as a protocol or platform.

1 / 8